Intensity Model

Explained:

default intensity

hazard rate

intensity model

mortality model

reduced form model

survival function

 
   

Intensity models (also called reduced form models) are a form of default model. Lets start by considering what are known as mortality models of default. These are essentially a discrete form of intensity model. Once we have established them, we will take a limit as time intervals go to zero—and out will pop intensity models.

Mortality models derive their name from their similarity to actuarial models of human mortality. Define a survival function s(t). It might indicate the probability of a human surviving until age t or the probability of a bond surviving without default for t years. For the rest of this article, we shall use it to denote the latter.

The probability of a bond defaulting in year t + 1 is given by

s(t) – s(t + 1) [1]

This is an unconditional probability. It reflects the probability at time 0 (when the bond is issued) of default between time t and time t + 1. If we want the conditional probability of default—that is, the probability of default between time t and time t + 1—we apply Bayes' theorem to obtain

[2]

A survival function can be constructed from historical bond default data. Constructed in this manner, the survival function defines a mortality model of default. Exhibit 1 indicates empirical survival functions by original credit quality. If the numbers were smoothed, it could reasonably be used to specify a mortality model for default.

Empirical Survival Functions by Original Credit Quality
Exhibit 1

year original credit rating
AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC
1 1 1 1 0.9988 0.9904 0.9840 0.9565
2 1 1 1 0.9940 0.9741 0.9354 0.8297
3 1 0.9965 0.9998 0.9886 0.9350 0.8797 0.6900
4 1 0.9946 0.9991 0.9827 0.9288 0.8215 0.6338
5 0.9997 0.9946 0.9988 0.9772 0.9088 0.7727 0.6147
6 0.9997 0.9946 0.9980 0.9715 0.9002 0.7406 0.5585
7 0.9997 0.9946 0.9975 0.9645 0.8853 0.7175 0.5330
8 0.9997 0.9946 0.9966 0.9630 0.8813 0.7024 0.5156
9 0.9997 0.9943 0.9960 0.9625 0.8659 0.6908 0.5156
10 0.9997 0.9941 0.9960 0.9602 0.8334 0.6849 0.4942

Empirical survival functions constructed from default data for 1971-2000. Source: Standard & Poor's.

 
 

Ads by Contingency Analysis

 

Now, instead of considering a one-year time interval, let's consider an arbitrary time interval t. Generalizing [2], the probability of default between time t and time t + t, conditional on their being no default by time t, is

[3]

We can express this as an average rate of default by dividing by the time interval t:

[4]

Consider an example. Let t be three years. Assume s(5) = 0.8921 and s(8) = 0.8609. Then the conditional probability of default between years 5 and 8 is

[5]

This is a probability of default over a three year period. By [4], we convert it to an average annual rate of default by dividing by 3. The result is an average rate of .0117 defaults per year over the three-year period.

To obtain an instantaneous rate of default f(t) at any time t, we take the limit as t goes to 0 in [4]:

[6]
[7]
[8]

where is the first derivative of s with respect to t.

The instantaneous rate of default f(t) is called the default intensity or, to borrow a word from insurance, the hazard rate. Intensity models work by assuming some functional form for f(t) and then calibrating that to current interest rate spreads. f(t) can reflect "real" probabilities to support credit risk management applications. It can reflect risk neutral probabilities to support financial engineering applications. The survival function is recovered from f(t) by rearranging [8] and integrating:

 

[9]

 

 
   

From this, probabilities of default can be obtained from [1] or [2] as appropriate.

Note how f(t) plays a role similar to that of a continuously compounded interest rate in [9]. Use of default intensities tends to simplify mathematics, which is one reason intensity models are popular with financial engineers.

Altman (1989), Asquith, Mullins and Wolff (1989) and Altman and Suggitt (2000) discuss mortality models of default. The first published intensity model appears to be Jarrow and Turnbull (1995). Subsequent research includes Duffie and Huang (1996), Jarrow, Lando and Turnbill (1997) and Duffie and Singleton (1997a, 1997b).

Related Internal Links

asset value model A type of default model.

credit derivative A derivative instrument designed to transfer credit risk from one party to another.

credit risk Risk due to uncertainty in a counterparty's ability to meet its obligations.

default model A type of model that assess the likelihood of default by an obligor.

portfolio credit risk Credit risk associated with a portfolio of obligations, typically of multiple obligors.

pre-settlement risk Credit risk of default on a derivative instrument prior to final settlement.

Sponsored Links

Ads by Contingency Analysis

 

Related Books

Caouette, et al. (1998) discuss mortality models. Duffie and Singleton (2003) is the essential book on intensity models. Written by two pioneers in the field, it discusses use of the models both in financial engineering and portfolio credit risk measurement. See also Arvanitis and Gregory (2001)

Managing Credit Risk
The Next Great Financial Challenge

J. Caouette, E. Altman and P. Narayanan

quality

 

technical  

1998

 

Credit Risk
Pricing, Measurement, and Management

Darrell Duffie and Ken Singleton

quality

 

technical  

2003

 

Credit
The Complete Guide to Pricing, Hedging and Risk Management

Angelo Arvanitis and Jon Gregory

quality

 

technical  

2001

 

Sponsored Links

Ads by Contingency Analysis

 

Related Papers

Altman E. I. (1989). Measuring corporate bond mortality and performance, Journal of Finance, 44 (4), 909-922.

Altman, Edward I., & Suggitt, Heather J. (2000). Default rates in the syndicated bank loan market - a mortality analysis, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24(1-2), 229-253.

Asquith, Paul, David W. Mullins and Eric D. Wolff (1989). Original issue high yield bonds: aging analyses of defaults, exchanges, and calls, Journal of Finance, 44 (4), 923-952.

Duffie, Darrell, and Ming Huang (1996). Swap Rates and Credit Quality, Journal of Finance, 51 (2), 921-49.

Duffie, Darrell and Kenneth Singleton (1997a). Modeling term structures of defaultable bonds, Review of Financial Studies, 12 (4), 687-720.

Duffie, Darrell and Kenneth Singleton (1997b). An Econometric Model of the Term Structure of Interest-Rate Swap Yields, Journal of Finance, 52 (4), 1287-1321.

Jarrow, Robert, Stuart Turnbull (1995). Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk', Journal of Finance, 50 (1), pp. 53-86

Jarrow, Robert, David Lando and Stuart Turnbull (1997). A Markov model for the term structure of credit spreads, Review of Financial Studies, 10 (2), 481-523.

Sponsored Links

 

Disclaimer

website: http://www.contingencyanalysis.com
glossary direct link: http://www.riskglossary.com
copyright © Contingency Analysis, 1996 - current