|
In the 1999 comic movie The Spy Who Shagged Me,
fictional spy Austin Powers has his "mojo" stolen by a Dr. Evil. With
his mojo gone, Powers seems to lose his manliness, decisiveness and
vitality. Don't ask what mojo is. The term is as obvious as it is
imprecise. In finance, we have a similar term, alpha.
Alpha is to a
portfolio manager what mojo is to Austin Powers. Unlike mojo, we can
precisely define alpha. It is a risk-adjusted performance metric (RAPM)
obtainable through a regression of a portfolio manager's
returns against
those of a benchmark. But this doesn't capture the significance of alpha
to the investment community or the emotions it engenders. There are lots
of RAPMs out there, but none are like alpha. You never hear portfolio
managers boasting about their Sharpe ratio over beers.
Alpha was defined by Michael Jensen (1968). He was
investigating the emerging
efficient market hypothesis and wanted to
determine whether mutual fund managers' historical returns indicated an
ability for some, at least, to outperform the overall market. A simple
approach would have been to compare mutual fund annual returns to annual
returns of the market portfolio, which might be represented by some
broad index, such as the S&P 500. Such a comparison could be
misleading because it doesn't take into account
risk. Sharpe (1964) had
recently published his
capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which indicates
that a portfolio's expected return will increase with its
systematic
risk (beta) according to the formula
|
E(Zp) = zf +
β[E(Zm) – zf] |
[1] |
That is, a portfolio's expected return E(Zp) equals the risk-free rate
zf plus the portfolio's
beta β multiplied by the expected excess return of the market portfolio
[E(Zm) – zf].
Consistent with this site's
notation system, Zp and
Zm are
capitalized because they are random variables. The risk-free rate
zf is
lower-case because it is a known constant. Formula [1] defines the portfolio's expected return as a
linear
polynomial of the market expected return. Its graph is a line—the
capital market line. Under the assumptions of CAPM, this is the line in
risk-return space that passes through the points corresponding to the
risk-free asset and the market portfolio.
|
|
 |
 |
|
Under the assumptions of CAPM, the capital
market line is the line in risk-return space passing through points
for the risk-free asset and the market portfolio. |
According to CAPM, portfolios may randomly outperform or
underperform the market from one year to the next. Over many years, the
random good years will tend to cancel the random bad years, and the
portfolio's long-run performance will fall on the capital market line
(if it is optimized under CAPM) or under the capital market line (if it
is not).
Jensen was interested in whether mutual fund
managers add value over the long-term. Could they—through skill,
privileged information or intuition—outperform the market reasonably
consistently, year after year? This was not about having randomly good
or bad years, but about having good years with noticeable consistently.
The CAPM formula [1] didn't accommodate this possibility, so Jensen added
a term to it that did:
|
E(Zp) = α + zf +
β[E(Zm) – zf] |
[3] |
and so alpha, α, was
born. This allows for a persistent positive (or negative!) contribution
to a portfolio's expected return due to the manager's skill (or
incompetence). Formula [2] is illustrated in Exhibit 2.
|
|
 |
 |
|
By adding alpha to CAPM, Jensen considered
the possibility of a portfolio residing above
the capital market line due to the skill, privileged information of
intuition of the portfolio manager.. |
Note that the three terms summed on the right side of
[2] are stacked up above each other in the exhibit, illustrating how
their sum is the portfolio's expected return. You can see how the alpha
term lifts the portfolio above the capital market line.
Jensen was not saying that some mutual fund managers do
consistently outperform the market. His model simply allowed for the
possibility in order that he might test whether any do. His next step
was to calculate some mutual fund's alphas and see if any were positive.
He gathered annual return data for the S&P 500, which he used as a proxy
for the market portfolio, and 115 mutual funds. He used fund returns
after fees but not including any sales loads. He had complete data for
1955-1964, but some funds had data going back as far as 1945, which he
used as well. He performed a regression for each mutual fund to
determine its alpha. His estimated alphas for all 115 mutual funds are
summarized in Exhibit 3, which is reproduced from his paper.
|
|
 |
 |
|
A frequency distribution of the alphas
Jensen estimated for 115 mutual funds based on at least ten years of
data for each. The vast majority have estimated alphas that are less
than zero. The average fund's alpha was –.011, or –1.1%. Results are
after fees but not including sales loads. Returns, and hence alphas,
are with continuous compounding. Reproduced from Jensen (1968). |
The vast majority of the funds had negative estimated
alphas, with the average being –1.1%. This means that, after fees, but
not including sales loads, the average fund underperformed the overall
market by 110 basis points a year. Looking at fund returns before fees,
the results were only marginally better. A majority still had
negative estimated alphas, but with the average being –0.4%. Jensen
noted
[1]
An examination [of the data] ... reveals only 3 funds
which have performance measures which are significantly positive at the
5% level. But before concluding that these funds are superior we should
remember that even if all 115 of these funds had a true
α equal to zero, we would expect (merely
because of random chance) to find 5% of them or about 5 or 6 funds ...
at the 5% level.
Jensen's results leant strong support for the efficient
market hypothesis, suggesting that no investment managers have positive
alpha.
Today, few practitioners recall Jensen's paper, but they
all know what alpha is. There are many
RAPMs at investment managers'
disposal, including the Sharpe ratio and the
Treynor ratio, but none is
as popular as alpha. Alpha isn't actually calculated that often. This
may be partly due to the fact that it requires many years of performance
data. Another reason, no doubt, is that Jensen's conclusion has been
reaffirmed many times. Investment managers' empirical alphas tend to
be embarrassingly negative.
Instead, alpha has become a symbol. It is a one-word
moniker for investment managers' belief they can outperform the market.
Alpha is out-performance, and it is the job of an active manager to
produce alpha. There are investment strategies with names like "alpha
transport" and books with titles like
Searching for Alpha . If
active investment management were a religion, alpha would be its god.
|
|
|
 |
|
arbitrage
A transaction which generates a risk-free profit.
beta—a metric of the systematic risk of a portfolio.
capital
asset pricing model A model for valuing
financial assets based upon their systematic risk.
directional strategy
A trading or investment strategy that entails taking net long or short
positions in a market.
efficient market
hypothesis A financial theory that markets are efficient in the sense that
prices reflect all available information.
event driven strategy
Speculative trading strategy that seeks to exploit relative mispricings between
securities whose issuers are involved in mergers, divestures, restructurings or
other corporate events.
law of one price
The notion that, if two assets have identical cash flows, they should have the
same market value.
market neutral
strategy Speculative trading strategy that seeks to exploit relative mispricings
between instruments while avoiding systematic risk.
portfolio theory A body of theory relating
to how investors optimize portfolio selections.
random walk
hypothesis Financial model based
on the empirical observation that stock and commodity prices behave like a
random walk.
risk-adjusted performance metric
Any metric of performance that balances reward against risk.
Sharpe
ratio, Treynor ratio Two risk-adjusted performance metrics
developed for testing the efficient market hypothesis and widely
used by investment managers since. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jensen,
Michael (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period
1945-1964, Journal of Finance, 23 (2), 389-416
Sharpe, William F. (1964). Capital
asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of
risk, Journal of Finance, 19 (3), 425-442. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|