|
A floater is a fixed income
instrument whose coupon fluctuates with some designated reference rate.
Syndicated loans are usually structured as
floaters, as are floating rate notes, which are discussed below.
A
floating rate note (FRN) is a floater
issued by a corporation, sovereign or
government sponsored
enterprise. Typically, FRNs have maturities
of about five years. Three-month or six-month
Libor are two
commonly-used reference rates, as are
Treasury bill
yields, the prime rate
or the Fed funds rate.
Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) are also sometimes structured to
have floating rate coupons. These are called
floating rate CMOs. If collateral
comprises fixed rate mortgages, they can be structured by pairing
offsetting floater and inverse floater
tranches.
For FRNs, the coupon rate is usually reset each time
interest is paid. A reset date is any date
on which the reset takes place based on the value of the index on that
date. A typical arrangement is to pay interest at the
end of each quarter based on the value of 3-month Libor two business days
before the start of that quarter. The coupon rate is calculated as the reference rate plus a
fixed spread, which depends upon the issuer's
credit quality and specifics of how the
instrument is structured. One feature that can affect the spread is
provisions that place a cap or floor on the floating coupon rate. For
example, an FRN might be issued with a cap of 7.5% and a floor of 1.5%.
Unlike a fixed-rate coupon bond,
a floater's market value depends almost
entirely on the issuer's credit quality because there is little or no
interest rate risk associated with a
floater. To illustrate why, consider how we might value a floater that has
no credit risk. At first, even this may appear to be a daunting task. Future cash flows
depend upon as-yet undetermined future values of the reference rate. How
can we value those cash flows if we know their timing but not their
magnitude? There is a surprisingly simple answer. Let's illustrate with an
example.
Suppose we purchased a
USD
100MM 2-year credit risk free FRN a month ago. It pays 6-month Libor
flat. The initial value for the reference rate was 2.8%, so we will
receive our first coupon of USD 1.42MM in five months (assuming, for this
example, 183 days in the first coupon period). To value the instrument,
let's decompose it into four pieces:
A
cash flow of USD101.42MM to be received in five months.
A
forward contract to invest USD 100MM for a period of six months starting
five months from today. The interest rate will be the value of 6-month
Libor at the start of that period.
A
forward contract to invest USD 100MM for a period of six months starting
eleven months from today. The interest rate will be the value of 6-month
Libor at the start of that period.
A
forward contract to invest USD 100MM for a period of six months starting
seventeen months from today. The interest rate will be the value of
6-month Libor at the start of that period.
The value of the FRN will simply be the sum value of these
four components.
Let's start with the last three components—the forwards.
These aren't standard forward rate
agreements, which lock in a future interest rate. Instead, these
simply guarantee to pay whatever Libor rate is quoted in the market at the
onset of their respective interest periods. How much are these guarantees
worth? The answer is nothing. All three forwards have no value.
To see why, consider a similar guarantee. Suppose I
guarantee to sell you an ounce of gold three months from now at whatever
is the market price of gold at that time. What is this guarantee worth? It
is worthless. You, or anyone, will be able to buy gold three months from
now at the then-current market price of gold. This is true irrespective of
my guarantee, so my guarantee is worthless. In the exact same way, a
forward on a loan that guarantees interest at whatever Libor rate is
available at the start of the loan is also worthless.
Of the above four components, the last three—the
forwards—all have zero market value. This leaves the first component. It
comprises a single future cash flow. Its market value is simply the
discounted value of that cash flow. Accordingly, the market value of the
FRN is also the discounted value of that cash flow. (Note, referring back
to the above four components, the cash flow isn't merely the coupon
payment. It is the coupon payment and an imputed return of principle.)
This is a general result. The value of an FRN paying Libor
flat is simply the value of the next coupon plus the
principal—both
discounted from the next coupon date.
If an FRN pays a spread over Libor, we generalize the
above argument by splitting the instrument into two components:
An
FRN paying Libor flat.
An
annuity that lasts the life of the FRN and pays coupons equal to the
dollar value of the spread.
The first is valued as above. The second is a stream of
fixed cash flows. Its value is simply the sum of the discounted values of
those cash flows. Note that both of the above components entail interest
rate risk. We have already explained why this is modest for the FRN paying
Libor flat. It is modest for the annuity because its cash flows are
generally small relative to those of the first component, so its
contribution to the overall instrument's interest rate risk is small. For these
reasons, a credit risk free FRN tends to have a stable
market value. With an FRN paying Libor flat, the
duration of the FRN is the
time until the next interest payment. If it pays a spread over Libor, that
spread will tend to increase the duration, but a credit risk free FRN will
generally trade close to its par value.
Based on the above discussion, holding an FRN is like investing in
a money market
instrument and a small fixed annuity. The significant difference is the fact
that the "money market instrument" involves a commitment to keep
reinvesting for the life of the FRN. This entails
long-term credit exposure to the issuer,
and this is typically reflected in the FRN's spread.
Because an FRN entails little interest rate risk, its
risk—and hence its price—is primarily determined
by the instrument's time to maturity and the credit quality of the issuer.
In this sense, the FRN is almost a pure credit play. It is like a
credit derivative in this respect.
|
|
 |
|
bond Securitized debt.
cap A type of
derivative instrument that offers protection against rising interest rates.
collateralized
mortgage obligation A type of
mortgage-backed security.
corporate bond
A bond issued by a corporation.
credit risk Risk due to
uncertainty in a counterparty's ability to meet its obligations.
duration and convexity Factor sensitivities indicating first order (linear)
and second order (quadratic) sensitivity to parallel shifts
in the spot cure.
fixed income
term structure Refers collectively to a spot curve, forward curve,
discount curve, yield curve or any other curve that describes the time value of
money at a particulate point in time.
floor A type of
derivative instrument that offers protection against declining interest rates.
interest
rate swap A swap under which both cash flow streams are in the same currency and are defined as cash flow streams that might be associated with some fixed income obligations.
inverse
floater A floater whose coupon varies inversely to its
reference rate.
mortgage
backed security A security interest in
mortgage collateral.
syndicated loan
A loan made collectively by a group of lenders to a single borrower.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
These two books discuss, respectively,
floating rate notes and mortgage-backed derivatives backed by
adjustable rate mortgages.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ads by Contingency Analysis
|
|
|
 |
|
VaR
on FRNs 09 Dec 2003
Value-at-risk for floating rate notes.
Duration
of FRNs 19 Sep 2002
Duration of non-standard floating rate notes.
FRN
Duration 15 Feb 1999
Assessing the market and credit risk of floating rate notes. |
|
|
|
|