|
In the English language, the word "short" is sometimes
used to indicate an inadequacy, as in "short of cash" or "short of time."
In finance, this usage is applied to situations where a party sells
securities he does not possess. Such a sale is called a
short sale because it creates for that party an
inadequacy—a net negative position—in the sold security. Short selling—or
shorting—is perfectly legal in most
jurisdictions. You simply borrow the securities from one party and sell
them to another party. Short selling is one of the primary reasons for
securities lending, without which,
short selling would be impossible.
A party who sells securities short is called a
short seller or simply a
short. Often short sellers are speculators
who anticipate that a security's price will decline.
Consider an example. A speculator borrows 10,000
shares of
IBM stock when the stock is trading at
USD
100. She sells the shares at that price. A month later, the price of IBM
has fallen to USD 95. She buys 10,000 shares at that price and returns
them to the party from whom she borrowed the original 10,000. Ignoring
transaction costs and payments to the lending party, she pockets USD 5 per
share—or USD 50,000 for the entire transaction.
A portfolio that has a net negative holding in a security
is said be be short that security. If it has a
net positive holding in the security, it is said to be
long the security. Such holdings are referred to, respectively, as
a short position and a
long position in the security A long
position benefits from an increase in the security's price. A short
position benefits from a decline in the security's price.
One might think that, if short sellers were aggressively
shorting a particular security, that this would portend a decline in the
security's price. Paradoxically, the opposite is often true. Because
shorts must eventually buy back those securities they have sold short,
they represent pent up demand for the security.
A short squeeze is a
speculative trading strategy that is sometimes observed when a security
has been heavily sold short. Recognizing the situation, speculators start
acquiring the security, driving up its price. As the price rises, short
sellers have to post additional collateral
for their borrowed securities. This puts pressure on the shorts. Some
won't have sufficient collateral to post. Others will simply decide they
don't want to hold a position that is losing money. Either way, those
shorts close out their positions—buying the securities in the market and
returning them to the parties who lent them. By purchasing the securities,
these quitting shorts drive the price higher, putting more pressure on the
remaining shorts.
In a short squeeze, the price of the shorted security can
rise above levels that anyone might otherwise consider reasonable. The
squeeze becomes a battle of wills between the shorts and the speculators
who are squeezing them. If the squeeze succeeds, the shorts will be forced
to buy the security at unreasonably high levels. The speculators who
forced them to do so will sell at those elevated prices and pocket a
profit. If the squeeze fails, the price of the security will fall. The
speculators will suffer losses on their long positions and the shorts will
profit—or at least not lose their shirts.
A long-short position
combines a long position in one security and a short position in another.
For example, a speculator may not have a view on whether the stock market
overall will appreciate or depreciate in the near future, but suppose she
believes that technology stocks will outperform oil stocks. To act on this
view, she might create a long-short position by acquiring a technology
stock she likes and selling short an oil stock she doesn't like. If the
long and short positions are for equal numbers of shares, the long-short
position exposes the speculator to the spread
between the price of the long stock and that of the short stock. More
often, she will match them dollar for dollar instead of share for share.
This will expose her to the difference in their respective
returns.
A portfolio is said to be
market neutral if all its short positions offset all its long
positions, leaving the portfolio with no net exposure to the overall
market. In essence, the entire portfolio is a long-short position in
multiple securities. Its performance is unaffected by broad market
movements. Instead, it depends upon relative movements in the prices of
the long and short securities. In equity markets, a market neutral
portfolio is structured to have a zero net beta.
While the "long" vs. "short" terminology first developed
in securities markets, its meaning has evolved to encompass similar
contexts in the commodity, energy and
derivative markets. Generally, if the
market value of a portfolio
increases or decreases with the price of some asset, the portfolio is said
to be long that asset. In the opposite case, it is short the asset.
If a portfolio has sold natural gas
forward, it is said to
be short natural gas. Note that no actual short sale of natural gas has
taken place—the portfolio has not borrowed natural gas for the purpose of
selling it. However, a similar effect was achieved by selling the natural
gas forward. Accordingly, "long" and "short" refer more to net exposure
than to the actual mechanics of how that exposure was achieved. In this
sense, a portfolio is long an
underlier if its delta for that
underlier is positive. It is short the underlier if the delta is negative.
You can go long an underlier by buying calls on
the underlier. You can go short by buying
puts.
Consistent with this convention, in some
derivatives markets, it is common
to speak of one party as being long a derivative and the other party being
short the derivative. The long party is the one for whom the derivative
creates a long exposure in the underlier. For example, with a
futures contract on aluminum, the party who will
receive aluminum under the future is said to be long the future. The party
who will deliver the aluminum is said to be short the future. In some
derivatives markets, this convention is ambiguous. What is the underlier
of a fixed-for-floating swap? In the
swap market, there is a convention that the receive-fixed party is long
the swap. However, you are likely to avoid much confusion if you speak of
the receive fixed and receive floating parties instead of the long and
short parties to a swap.
Even more generally, the terms "long" and "short" are used
to describe exposure to almost any financial variable. For example, you
can be long or short a given spread. A negative
vega position may be described as
short volatility, etc.
|
|
 |
|
beta
A measure of systematic risk.
collateral
Assets held to secure an obligation.
derivative instrument An instrument
which derives its value from the value of other financial
instruments. Article includes a list of vanilla and exotic derivatives.
Greeks A set of
factor sensitivities used to measure risk exposures related to
options or other derivatives.
hypothecation The posting of collateral.
managed futures
Portfolios of forwards or futures managed as an "alternative asset category."
repurchase agreement An agreement to sell and later repurchase securities at
specific prices.
securities lending The
lending of securities, usually for a fee. |
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ads by Contingency Analysis
|
|
|
 |
|
There are few good books on short
selling. For short selling in equity markets, Fabozzi (2004)
is about the best.
|
|
|
|
|
|