|
Sums of random variables occur frequently in financial
applications. Let's start with an example.
Assume that monthly log returns of some asset are
independent and normally distributed. The asset's one-year return will be
the sum of 12 consecutive monthly returns. Will that one-year return also be normally distributed? The answer is "yes." This is because
the 12 monthly returns are independent and normal, so they are
joint-normal. A sum of joint-normal random variables must be normal.
What if the monthly returns are not normal? Assume that
they are independent and identically distributed. Their common
distribution is not normal, but its mean and
standard deviation exist.
Will the annual return also have that same distribution? Now the answer is
"no." This follows from the
central limit theorem,
which tell us that the distribution for the annual return will be
approximately normal.
This poses a problem for finance. We don't want to have to
change our financial models each time we change our unit of time. If we
assume that returns have a certain distribution over a day, we would like
them to have the same distribution (perhaps with a different mean and
standard deviation) over a month. If we assume the returns are normally
distributed, there is no problem, but what if we want to assume some other
distribution?
This is the problem Benoit Mandelbrot contemplated in the
early 1960s. It would lead to his groundbreaking (1963) paper suggesting
that asset returns be modeled with stable Paretian distributions. This
article describes that work and introduces stable Paretian distributions.
Mandelbrot was trying to model cotton prices. His analysis
of historical data indicated that returns had sample distributions that
were highly leptokurtic. They had "fat tails" that made extreme market
moves more likely than would be predicted by the normal distribution. This
phenomena has been observed before, and today we know it is typical of most
asset returns—stock,
bond, commodity and energy returns routinely exhibit
leptokurtosis. This is particularly extreme for energy returns.
|
|
 |
 |
|
Probability density functions (PDFs) are
illustrated for a normal and a leptokurtic distribution. Sample
asset return distributions tend to be leptokurtic. This means that
markets tend to experience extreme moves more frequently than would
be predicted based on an assumption that returns are normally
distributed. |
Mandelbrot didn't want to have to assume one distribution
for daily returns, another for monthly returns, and still another for
annual returns. This would reduce any model to mere empirical distribution
fitting. He wanted a consistent, flexible model that could be fit to
different asset returns irrespective of the unit of time over which
returns were calculated. This was possible with a model that assumed
normally distributed returns, but normal distributions didn't fit
historical data well.
The problem was the central limit theorem, which tells us
that sums of random variables will converge to a normal random variable.
The only way to get around the central limit theorem was to depart from one of
its two main assumptions:
that the random variables are independent, and
that they have finite standard deviations.
Departing from the first assumption would have meant
abandoning the random walk hypothesis, which fits historical data well
for many traded assets. Mandelbrot chose to depart from the second
assumption and consider distributions whose standard deviations don't
exist.
A probability distribution with distribution function
is said to be stable if for any independent
random variables
all having that distribution function
,
there exists constants a and b such that the random variable
 |
[1] |
also has that same distribution function
.
Stated informally, such a distribution is "stable" under addition.
As we have already noted, the central limit theorem
suggests that the normal distribution is the only stable distribution
whose standard deviation is defined. There are others whose standard
deviations are not defined (or can be thought of as infinite). Paul Levy
(1925, 1937) identified the general class of stable distributions. Just as
a normal distribution can be specified with
a mean μ and
standard deviation σ, stable distributions can be specified with four
parameters:

determines tail thickness. It satisfies 0 <
2. Generally, as
decreases,
tail thickness increases.

determines asymmetry. It satisfies –1
1, with
= 0 corresponding to a symmetric distribution. A positive
indicates that the right tail is fatter than the left tail. If
= 1,
must equal 0.

is a scale parameter satisfying
0, although the case
= 0 is degenerate (similar to having a 0 standard deviation).

is a location parameter and can take on any
real value. If
> 1,
equals the mean of the distribution.
This is one standard parameterization that is commonly
used. Other very similar
parameterizations are also used, so be careful to check any author's
definitions carefully.
The distribution's mean exists so long as
> 1. Its
standard deviation exists only in the case
= 2. Just as we define a
standard normal
distribution as a normal distribution whose mean and standard deviation
are 0 and 1, we say a stable distribution is
standardized or reduced if
= 1 and
= 0.
There are only three cases in
which a closed form expression is known for a stable distribution's probability density
function. These are the
normal
distribution:
= 2 (the
value of
becomes
irrelevant in this case),
Cauchy
distribution:
= 1,
= 0,
Levy
distribution:
= 0.5,
= 1.
For this reason, theoretical
work with stable distributions tends to be presented in terms of
characteristic functions instead of probability density functions or
distribution functions. However, density functions or distribution
functions can always be valued using
numerical techniques.
The general formula for the characteristic function of a stable
distribution is
 |
[2] |
where log denotes a
natural logarithm and x/|x| is understood to equal 0 when
x = 0.
Non-normal stable
distributions have "fat tails" that generally satisfy a convergence
property defined by Vilfredo Pareto. For this reason, non-normal stable
distributions are often called
stable Paretian distributions.
Despite their merits for
modeling asset returns, stable Paretian distributions have remained a
fringe topic in finance, occasionally mentioned by researchers, but rarely
implemented by practitioners. This may be because the mathematics of these
distributions is more technical than that of more familiar distributions.
Perhaps distributions with undefined standard deviations are simply too
counter-intuitive for most people. Modest research is, however, ongoing.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Rachev et al (2005)
Is an accessible introduction to stable Paretian distributions in
finance.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Ads by Contingency Analysis
|
|
|
 |
|
Levy,
Paul (1925) Calcul des Probabilities, Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
Levy,
Paul (1937) Theorie de L'addition des Variables Aleatoires,
Paris: Gauthier-Villars.
Mandelbrot,
Benoit B. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices,
Journal of Business, 36, 394-419. Also appearing in Cootner,
Paul H. (1964). The Random Character of Stock Market Prices,
Cambridge: MIT Press. |
|
|
|
|